Housing is unaffordable for 46% of all Lincoln renters.
An estimated 21,200 Lincoln households are cost-burdened by their housing. About 86% of extremely low-income families in Lincoln spend more than one-third of their income on rent. Lincoln must address these issues.
If implemented in Lincoln, the following policy proposals would increase our city’s affordable housing stock and/or the resources to increase housing affordability for low-income families.
Collective Impact Lincoln has identified the following policy changes which, if implemented in Lincoln, would increase the affordable housing stock and/or the resources to increase housing affordability for low-income families.
Sources: National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2019 Advocates Guide (2019); Estimates from 2012-2016 HUD CHAS data, available from the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) website. Unaffordability is defined as having a cost burden, which means spending more than 30% of income on rent.
New housing residential developments above a certain size must either:
TIF is a public subsidy given to developers to help finance redevelopment projects. Because these projects are publicly subsidized, taxpayers should get more than market-rate development in exchange when TIF is used for housing development. TIF can be reformed by ensuring that housing developments subsidized by TIF dollars either:
Collective Impact Lincoln has identified the following policy changes which, if implemented in Lincoln, would increase the affordable housing stock and/or the resources to increase housing affordability for low-income families.
Sources: National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2019 Advocates Guide (2019); Estimates from 2012-2016 HUD CHAS data, available from the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) website. Unaffordability is defined as having a cost burden, which means spending more than 30% of income on rent.
New housing residential developments above a certain size must either:
TIF is a public subsidy given to developers to help finance redevelopment projects. Because these projects are publicly subsidized, taxpayers should get more than market-rate development in exchange when TIF is used for housing development. TIF can be reformed by ensuring that housing developments subsidized by TIF dollars either: